[{"0":"UgxjODjIl2XLK-rwW114AaABAg","1":"10 minutes ago","2":"@ChudExodus","3":"b5f5qny936XRL60MI77CkA","4":"zyrTqnA4kbu25vGlwnr_ZA_d7axXyhJ-xwUwVjzsnsytN5hyQniyI7ztlDIF9zvbi2exb0MgXw","5":"First","6":"0 likes","7":0,"8":0}][{"0":"UgwfXWfDltqkI8kEGJ54AaABAg","1":"3 minutes ago","2":"@HudsonBlack999","3":"oT8AWYagDYQmxkEwACVYZw","4":"XB6cxzn3ukb9gnxx2bYLgRjCeyFdvRcBelU0cPtGQTURUhbWDpi5VjtaHTQeZxccNioznU7g","5":"Thoughts on Graham Oppy?","6":"0 likes","7":0,"8":0},{"0":"Ugxxi-3KfmJKHTE4ef54AaABAg","1":"22 minutes ago","2":"@adisgracedliberal","3":"D-VDUHkVmxf3AVXh7AK62g","4":"omjSoVKWEYQoqM0W9chy11xHzjoWEIEFYMDgnePoBqqhTGIs81MK0ThX6ETX8z234mPNapSU","5":"I'm half way through and I'm glad you're calling out the \"science\" redditors who champion statistics and research, but treat anything they disagree with as binary. Its ironic if you speak on something that's not allowed, they are able to accept nuance, multivariate\/multidimensional analysis, and gradients to say that wrongthink doesn't show that consensus hypotheses are true. Your example about failing to prove an hypothesis vs something being wrong is something people learn in an intro stats class, but these redditors wouldn't know that. Great vid!","6":"1 like","7":0,"8":1},{"0":"UgywbMuOTO1l3x8JTnZ4AaABAg","1":"27 minutes ago","2":"@Markoth-lp1bj","3":"VG9ysnqUADiia29I4h8I0g","4":"lkd0rxDNf5fMK_UoPYRhOsgwNtwY9ZOs1KY-dpA5QhVhAqxMEwBKhHbjPdHHUvhecsUw","5":"The smug idiot has no concept of how much uncertainty actually exists in science. A huge number of scientific claims aren't simple observations that something definitively is or isn't the case; they're statistical inferences from noisy data. Even the distinction between a \"significant\" and \"non-significant\" result often depends on a significance threshold that humans have chosen as a practical convention. There is no law of nature separating p = .049 from p = .051. Left wing academics abuse intentionally and unintentionally this fact and midwits slop it up like in the claim that there is no basis whatsoever for biological race.","6":"5 likes","7":0,"8":2},{"0":"Ugw59bpfY6Cw6gWvUtV4AaABAg","1":"29 minutes ago","2":"@transientcynic","3":"6tsBmdAlQ2jG1qoxf3QUwg","4":"wwwWw3rBCD9DKiaEOjhjaAEAIVf4arqBQeMnJquV_GMOqtgsqya-mv3grOwDoNODud0FYJd-","5":"Sneed","6":"2 likes","7":0,"8":1},{"0":"Ugw2L9KRzLI2pNVqL6F4AaABAg","1":"31 minutes ago","2":"@HeyyaHeyyaHeyya","3":"JHv4Emsqo9jvbnF7r7bm0Q","4":"Wm4xCjfpC1pf7NOWUv0Ewx8uVxvtyLOW-awANNaIgxwv9WlMuSmrQvACm4YTky4d6rEmmSM5","5":"\u201cI believe in empiricism\u201d\n\ud83e\udd2e","6":"4 likes","7":0,"8":1},{"0":"UgwR31Ci_VNrBdA2fcd4AaABAg","1":"32 minutes ago","2":"@HudsonBlack999","3":"oT8AWYagDYQmxkEwACVYZw","4":"XB6cxzn3ukb9gnxx2bYLgRjCeyFdvRcBelU0cPtGQTURUhbWDpi5VjtaHTQeZxccNioznU7g","5":"4th","6":"1 like","7":0,"8":2},{"0":"Ugwgmi3fo1y-W2kDAp54AaABAg","1":"33 minutes ago","2":"@HeyyaHeyyaHeyya","3":"JHv4Emsqo9jvbnF7r7bm0Q","4":"Wm4xCjfpC1pf7NOWUv0Ewx8uVxvtyLOW-awANNaIgxwv9WlMuSmrQvACm4YTky4d6rEmmSM5","5":"Third and gay","6":"0 likes","7":0,"8":1},{"0":"UgyKnSfzHbev2JE5qop4AaABAg","1":"41 minutes ago","2":"@wolfslumberz1991","3":"KN5fViBIk4u0qvXxURUU4w","4":"VNsxNr7I9ECkR0LQzHWacUWW5ahGVDu5k4l_TNx8bjLzlfa9tUvUoU2BST08V_18eWqIlzjEgfQ","5":"Second","6":"0 likes","7":0,"8":1},{"0":"UgxjODjIl2XLK-rwW114AaABAg","1":"52 minutes ago","2":"@ChudExodus","3":"b5f5qny936XRL60MI77CkA","4":"zyrTqnA4kbu25vGlwnr_ZA_d7axXyhJ-xwUwVjzsnsytN5hyQniyI7ztlDIF9zvbi2exb0MgXw","5":"First","6":"0 likes","7":0,"8":1}][{"0":"UgwwjNHYB18oKza5i-F4AaABAg","1":"6 minutes ago","2":"@SurfbyShootin","3":"CoA71g7ECzoGz5D-jQfDaQ","4":"kHKJt0hHhCkLg5Xs36bns7nQJWbgyENu7J-e4ZNsu5pTQ","5":"I just finished reading a volume of one of my books on Sauropods (just a collection of studies no narrative) and it's an intersection between bone morphology, geology and systematics. It's very agnostic in that you'll commonly find trinary interpretations with authors referencing competitors. There are charts on measurements (subjective landmarks on bones, shared or differing features, cataloging etc,) maps with geological formations (surveys, bone maps, layers etc) which form a holistic process of peleontological interpretation. There isn't as much settled common sense, it's constantly evolving.\n\nIDK what I'm babbling on about, high IQ video is probably all I needed to say.","6":"0 likes","7":0,"8":0},{"0":"Ugwh_7YZJCbiyvLmZcB4AaABAg","1":"21 minutes ago","2":"@ruddyman4928","3":"Py-l66Ytd6db4nGEm1mqOw","4":"93_hdQ-B7vY7P49HoeDelw18ku4Z5e34ZRnPChY9eWAa4eU6v-x7kzkmokNFClRVPD4LsvOz","5":"I think in one of your streams recently you were saying that what whiteness basically is is empiricism and that that's why nons can't assimilate to it since they basically lack the faculties. And based on what you're saying in this video empiricism may be a very powerful group evolutionary strategy, but it isn't necessarily any less dogmatic than Islam or grounded in objective truth.","6":"1 like","7":0,"8":1},{"0":"Ugy4suIjHMV7i7KM7F14AaABAg","1":"1 hour ago","2":"@nadavk00","3":"JAQH_zyD55NFPoq4TjD1kw","4":"o4q183heUQU88MJ_RrNkU9wpprrjSTsa3qGi6oTDzxBshslm61IGMH4DdkZDZeZQ0RiUQbX8jw","5":"The atheist position relies on the assumption that immaterial explanations are unnecessary to explain a material world. Our perception being an imperfect representation of reality, or logic itself being an imperfect operating language of our mind, are things that dont really need to be addressed in this context if we take a pragmatic approach. I can grant them and accept we are both imperfect human beings with an imperfect understanding yet still champion atheism as the coherent worldview based on my initial assumption. And if I am to be refuted by something other than Deism or so (specially judeo-abrahamics) then the burden of proof is yours because you're making a complex and weird specific claim about the world while I'm making a simple and broad one (jewish carpenter etcetc vs material is explained materially)","6":"1 like","7":0,"8":1},{"0":"UgwfXWfDltqkI8kEGJ54AaABAg","1":"1 hour ago","2":"@HudsonBlack999","3":"oT8AWYagDYQmxkEwACVYZw","4":"XB6cxzn3ukb9gnxx2bYLgRjCeyFdvRcBelU0cPtGQTURUhbWDpi5VjtaHTQeZxccNioznU7g","5":"Thoughts on Graham Oppy?","6":"3 likes","7":0,"8":1},{"0":"Ugxxi-3KfmJKHTE4ef54AaABAg","1":"2 hours ago","2":"@adisgracedliberal","3":"D-VDUHkVmxf3AVXh7AK62g","4":"omjSoVKWEYQoqM0W9chy11xHzjoWEIEFYMDgnePoBqqhTGIs81MK0ThX6ETX8z234mPNapSU","5":"I'm half way through and I'm glad you're calling out the \"science\" redditors who champion statistics and research, but treat anything they disagree with as binary. Its ironic if you speak on something that's not allowed, they are able to accept nuance, multivariate\/multidimensional analysis, and gradients to say that wrongthink doesn't show that consensus hypotheses are true. Your example about failing to prove an hypothesis vs something being wrong is something people learn in an intro stats class, but these redditors wouldn't know that. Great vid!","6":"5 likes","7":0,"8":1},{"0":"UgywbMuOTO1l3x8JTnZ4AaABAg","1":"2 hours ago","2":"@Markoth-lp1bj","3":"VG9ysnqUADiia29I4h8I0g","4":"lkd0rxDNf5fMK_UoPYRhOsgwNtwY9ZOs1KY-dpA5QhVhAqxMEwBKhHbjPdHHUvhecsUw","5":"The smug idiot has no concept of how much uncertainty actually exists in science. A huge number of scientific claims aren't simple observations that something definitively is or isn't the case; they're statistical inferences from noisy data. Even the distinction between a \"significant\" and \"non-significant\" result often depends on a significance threshold that humans have chosen as a practical convention. There is no law of nature separating p = .049 from p = .051. Left wing academics abuse intentionally and unintentionally this fact and midwits slop it up like in the claim that there is no basis whatsoever for biological race.","6":"7 likes","7":0,"8":3},{"0":"Ugw59bpfY6Cw6gWvUtV4AaABAg","1":"2 hours ago","2":"@transientcynic","3":"6tsBmdAlQ2jG1qoxf3QUwg","4":"wwwWw3rBCD9DKiaEOjhjaAEAIVf4arqBQeMnJquV_GMOqtgsqya-mv3grOwDoNODud0FYJd-","5":"Sneed","6":"3 likes","7":0,"8":1},{"0":"Ugw2L9KRzLI2pNVqL6F4AaABAg","1":"2 hours ago","2":"@HeyyaHeyyaHeyya","3":"JHv4Emsqo9jvbnF7r7bm0Q","4":"Wm4xCjfpC1pf7NOWUv0Ewx8uVxvtyLOW-awANNaIgxwv9WlMuSmrQvACm4YTky4d6rEmmSM5","5":"\u201cI believe in empiricism\u201d\n\ud83e\udd2e","6":"4 likes","7":0,"8":1},{"0":"UgwR31Ci_VNrBdA2fcd4AaABAg","1":"2 hours ago","2":"@HudsonBlack999","3":"oT8AWYagDYQmxkEwACVYZw","4":"XB6cxzn3ukb9gnxx2bYLgRjCeyFdvRcBelU0cPtGQTURUhbWDpi5VjtaHTQeZxccNioznU7g","5":"4th","6":"1 like","7":0,"8":2},{"0":"Ugwgmi3fo1y-W2kDAp54AaABAg","1":"2 hours ago","2":"@HeyyaHeyyaHeyya","3":"JHv4Emsqo9jvbnF7r7bm0Q","4":"Wm4xCjfpC1pf7NOWUv0Ewx8uVxvtyLOW-awANNaIgxwv9WlMuSmrQvACm4YTky4d6rEmmSM5","5":"Third and gay","6":"0 likes","7":0,"8":2},{"0":"UgyKnSfzHbev2JE5qop4AaABAg","1":"2 hours ago","2":"@wolfslumberz1991","3":"KN5fViBIk4u0qvXxURUU4w","4":"VNsxNr7I9ECkR0LQzHWacUWW5ahGVDu5k4l_TNx8bjLzlfa9tUvUoU2BST08V_18eWqIlzjEgfQ","5":"Second","6":"0 likes","7":0,"8":1},{"0":"UgxjODjIl2XLK-rwW114AaABAg","1":"2 hours ago","2":"@ChudExodus","3":"b5f5qny936XRL60MI77CkA","4":"zyrTqnA4kbu25vGlwnr_ZA_d7axXyhJ-xwUwVjzsnsytN5hyQniyI7ztlDIF9zvbi2exb0MgXw","5":"First","6":"0 likes","7":0,"8":1}][{"0":"UgwwjNHYB18oKza5i-F4AaABAg","1":"24 minutes ago","2":"@SurfbyShootin","3":"CoA71g7ECzoGz5D-jQfDaQ","4":"kHKJt0hHhCkLg5Xs36bns7nQJWbgyENu7J-e4ZNsu5pTQ","5":"I just finished reading a volume of one of my books on Sauropods (just a collection of studies no narrative) and it's an intersection between bone morphology, geology and systematics. It's very agnostic in that you'll commonly find trinary interpretations with authors referencing competitors. There are charts on measurements (subjective landmarks on bones, shared or differing features, cataloging etc,) maps with geological formations (surveys, bone maps, layers etc) which form a holistic process of peleontological interpretation. There isn't as much settled common sense, it's constantly evolving.\n\nIDK what I'm babbling on about, high IQ video is probably all I needed to say.","6":"0 likes","7":0,"8":0},{"0":"Ugwh_7YZJCbiyvLmZcB4AaABAg","1":"39 minutes ago","2":"@ruddyman4928","3":"Py-l66Ytd6db4nGEm1mqOw","4":"93_hdQ-B7vY7P49HoeDelw18ku4Z5e34ZRnPChY9eWAa4eU6v-x7kzkmokNFClRVPD4LsvOz","5":"I think in one of your streams recently you were saying that what whiteness basically is is empiricism and that that's why nons can't assimilate to it since they basically lack the faculties. And based on what you're saying in this video empiricism may be a very powerful group evolutionary strategy, but it isn't necessarily any less dogmatic than Islam or grounded in objective truth.","6":"1 like","7":0,"8":2},{"0":"Ugy4suIjHMV7i7KM7F14AaABAg","1":"1 hour ago","2":"@nadavk00","3":"JAQH_zyD55NFPoq4TjD1kw","4":"o4q183heUQU88MJ_RrNkU9wpprrjSTsa3qGi6oTDzxBshslm61IGMH4DdkZDZeZQ0RiUQbX8jw","5":"The atheist position relies on the assumption that immaterial explanations are unnecessary to explain a material world. Our perception being an imperfect representation of reality, or logic itself being an imperfect operating language of our mind, are things that dont really need to be addressed in this context if we take a pragmatic approach. I can grant them and accept we are both imperfect human beings with an imperfect understanding yet still champion atheism as the coherent worldview based on my initial assumption. And if I am to be refuted by something other than Deism or so (specially judeo-abrahamics) then the burden of proof is yours because you're making a complex and weird specific claim about the world while I'm making a simple and broad one (jewish carpenter etcetc vs material is explained materially)","6":"1 like","7":0,"8":1},{"0":"UgwfXWfDltqkI8kEGJ54AaABAg","1":"2 hours ago","2":"@HudsonBlack999","3":"oT8AWYagDYQmxkEwACVYZw","4":"XB6cxzn3ukb9gnxx2bYLgRjCeyFdvRcBelU0cPtGQTURUhbWDpi5VjtaHTQeZxccNioznU7g","5":"Thoughts on Graham Oppy?","6":"3 likes","7":0,"8":1},{"0":"Ugxxi-3KfmJKHTE4ef54AaABAg","1":"2 hours ago","2":"@adisgracedliberal","3":"D-VDUHkVmxf3AVXh7AK62g","4":"omjSoVKWEYQoqM0W9chy11xHzjoWEIEFYMDgnePoBqqhTGIs81MK0ThX6ETX8z234mPNapSU","5":"I'm half way through and I'm glad you're calling out the \"science\" redditors who champion statistics and research, but treat anything they disagree with as binary. Its ironic if you speak on something that's not allowed, they are able to accept nuance, multivariate\/multidimensional analysis, and gradients to say that wrongthink doesn't show that consensus hypotheses are true. Your example about failing to prove an hypothesis vs something being wrong is something people learn in an intro stats class, but these redditors wouldn't know that. Great vid!","6":"5 likes","7":0,"8":1},{"0":"UgywbMuOTO1l3x8JTnZ4AaABAg","1":"2 hours ago","2":"@Markoth-lp1bj","3":"VG9ysnqUADiia29I4h8I0g","4":"lkd0rxDNf5fMK_UoPYRhOsgwNtwY9ZOs1KY-dpA5QhVhAqxMEwBKhHbjPdHHUvhecsUw","5":"The smug idiot has no concept of how much uncertainty actually exists in science. A huge number of scientific claims aren't simple observations that something definitively is or isn't the case; they're statistical inferences from noisy data. Even the distinction between a \"significant\" and \"non-significant\" result often depends on a significance threshold that humans have chosen as a practical convention. There is no law of nature separating p = .049 from p = .051. Left wing academics abuse intentionally and unintentionally this fact and midwits slop it up like in the claim that there is no basis whatsoever for biological race.","6":"7 likes","7":0,"8":3},{"0":"Ugw59bpfY6Cw6gWvUtV4AaABAg","1":"2 hours ago","2":"@transientcynic","3":"6tsBmdAlQ2jG1qoxf3QUwg","4":"wwwWw3rBCD9DKiaEOjhjaAEAIVf4arqBQeMnJquV_GMOqtgsqya-mv3grOwDoNODud0FYJd-","5":"Sneed","6":"3 likes","7":0,"8":1},{"0":"Ugw2L9KRzLI2pNVqL6F4AaABAg","1":"2 hours ago","2":"@HeyyaHeyyaHeyya","3":"JHv4Emsqo9jvbnF7r7bm0Q","4":"Wm4xCjfpC1pf7NOWUv0Ewx8uVxvtyLOW-awANNaIgxwv9WlMuSmrQvACm4YTky4d6rEmmSM5","5":"\u201cI believe in empiricism\u201d\n\ud83e\udd2e","6":"4 likes","7":0,"8":1},{"0":"UgwR31Ci_VNrBdA2fcd4AaABAg","1":"2 hours ago","2":"@HudsonBlack999","3":"oT8AWYagDYQmxkEwACVYZw","4":"XB6cxzn3ukb9gnxx2bYLgRjCeyFdvRcBelU0cPtGQTURUhbWDpi5VjtaHTQeZxccNioznU7g","5":"4th","6":"1 like","7":0,"8":2},{"0":"Ugwgmi3fo1y-W2kDAp54AaABAg","1":"2 hours ago","2":"@HeyyaHeyyaHeyya","3":"JHv4Emsqo9jvbnF7r7bm0Q","4":"Wm4xCjfpC1pf7NOWUv0Ewx8uVxvtyLOW-awANNaIgxwv9WlMuSmrQvACm4YTky4d6rEmmSM5","5":"Third and gay","6":"0 likes","7":0,"8":2},{"0":"UgyKnSfzHbev2JE5qop4AaABAg","1":"2 hours ago","2":"@wolfslumberz1991","3":"KN5fViBIk4u0qvXxURUU4w","4":"VNsxNr7I9ECkR0LQzHWacUWW5ahGVDu5k4l_TNx8bjLzlfa9tUvUoU2BST08V_18eWqIlzjEgfQ","5":"Second","6":"0 likes","7":0,"8":1},{"0":"UgxjODjIl2XLK-rwW114AaABAg","1":"2 hours ago","2":"@ChudExodus","3":"b5f5qny936XRL60MI77CkA","4":"zyrTqnA4kbu25vGlwnr_ZA_d7axXyhJ-xwUwVjzsnsytN5hyQniyI7ztlDIF9zvbi2exb0MgXw","5":"First","6":"0 likes","7":0,"8":1}]